Fracturas de pelvis con hematoma retroperitoneal asociado: tiempo hasta la angioembolización y resultados / Pelvic fractures with associated retroperitoneal hematoma: time until angioembolization and results

Introducción: El tratamiento de las fracturas de pelvis con hematoma retroperitoneal (HRP) es controvertido. Especialmente la necesidad de angioembolización (AE) cuando no hay extravasación de contraste (EC) en la tomografía computarizada (TC) o angiografía. Otro aspecto relevante es el retraso hasta la misma. Nuestro objetivo ha sido determinar si existen diferencias en el tiempo hasta la AE entre los pacientes admitidos durante el horario laboral y los admitidos fuera del mismo y durante los fines de semana y festivos. Nuestra hipótesis era que la angiografía y AE serían más frecuentes en el horario laboral, y el tiempo hasta las mismas sería superior fuera del horario laboral habitual, con una mortalidad mayor en este grupo para una gravedad global similar. Un objetivo secundario ha sido valorar la correlación entre EC en la TC y la angiografía. Métodos: Análisis retrospectivo de 2 cohortes de pacientes con HRP por fractura de pelvis. Se estudia la realización de angiografía dividiendo a los pacientes según su hora de llegada a lo largo de un periodo de 24 años (grupo A: horario laboral, y grupo B: fuera del mismo). La indicación de angiografía y AE fue realizada por la guardia de cirugía general, en consenso con el radiólogo intervencionista. Se han analizado variables demográficas, mecanismo lesivo, lesiones asociadas, gravedad fisiológica y anatómica, EC en la TC y la angiografía, necesidad de AE, estancia en unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) y mortalidad. Resultados: Se admitió a 104 pacientes con diagnóstico de HRP por fractura pélvica. Se realizó angiografía, con AE en 63 casos (61%). Los grupos eran comparables en las variables analizadas. En el 70% de los pacientes del grupo A se realizó angiografía, frente al 57% del grupo B, sin diferencias en tiempo hasta la AE. Se demostró EC en la TC en 53 de los 96 pacientes en los que se hizo, lo que se confirmó mediante angiografía en el 85%. No hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas de mortalidad entre ambos grupos. Conclusiones: Se demuestra un tiempo corto entre la admisión en Urgencias y la AE, sin relación con el momento del ingreso durante el día, y una buena correlación entre la EC en la TC y la angiografía

Introduction: Two areas of controversy in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures are the need to perform angioembolization (AE) in patients with a retroperitoneal hematoma (RPH) but no contrast extravasation (CE) on Computerized Tomography (CT) and/or angiography, and the delay to AE. Our main objective was to assess whether there had been differences in the percentage and delay to AE between patients admitted on weekdays versus off-hours (weekends and admission after 3pm) at our hospital. Our hypothesis was that angiography and AE would be more frequent on weekdays, and the time delay would be longer during off-hours, with a higher mortality in this latter group for a similar overall severity. A secondary objective was to assess the correlation between CE on CT scan and angiography. Methods: Retrospective review of two cohorts of patients with RPH from a pelvic fracture during a period of 24 years. Patients were divided depending on the time of arrival (Group A: weekdays, and Group B: off-hours). The decision to perform angiography and AE was made by the general surgeons on call, in consensus with the interventional radiologist. We analyzed demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, physiologic and anatomic trauma scores, CE on CT scan, need of AE, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and mortality. Results: 104 patients were admitted with RPH from a pelvic fracture. We performed AE in 63 cases (61%). The groups were comparable in the variables analyzed. In 70% of patients in group A, angiography was done, vs 57% in group B, with the same median time delay. CE on CT scan was seen in 53 out of 96 patients and confirmed by angiography in 45 (85%) of them. No significant differences were found in mortality between the two groups. Conclusions: There was a short delay from admission to AE, even during off-hours, and a good correlation of CE on CT scan and angiography

Pelvic fractures with associated retroperitoneal hematoma: time until angioembolization and results. / Fracturas de pelvis con hematoma retroperitoneal asociado: tiempo hasta la angioembolización y resultados.

INTRODUCTION: Two areas of controversy in the management of bleeding pelvic fractures are the need to perform angioembolization (AE) in patients with a retroperitoneal hematoma (RPH) but no contrast extravasation (CE) on Computerized Tomography (CT) and/or angiography, and the delay to AE. Our main objective was to assess whether there had been differences in the percentage and delay to AE between patients admitted on weekdays versus off-hours (weekends and admission after 3pm) at our hospital. Our hypothesis was that angiography and AE would be more frequent on weekdays, and the time delay would be longer during off-hours, with a higher mortality in this latter group for a similar overall severity. A secondary objective was to assess the correlation between CE on CT scan and angiography. METHODS: Retrospective review of two cohorts of patients with RPH from a pelvic fracture during a period of 24 years. Patients were divided depending on the time of arrival (Group A: weekdays, and Group B: off-hours). The decision to perform angiography and AE was made by the general surgeons on call, in consensus with the interventional radiologist. We analyzed demographics, mechanism of injury, associated injuries, physiologic and anatomic trauma scores, CE on CT scan, need of AE, Intensive Care Unit (ICU) stay and mortality. RESULTS: 104 patients were admitted with RPH from a pelvic fracture. We performed AE in 63 cases (61%). The groups were comparable in the variables analyzed. In 70% of patients in group A, angiography was done, vs 57% in group B, with the same median time delay. CE on CT scan was seen in 53 out of 96 patients and confirmed by angiography in 45 (85%) of them. No significant differences were found in mortality between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: There was a short delay from admission to AE, even during off-hours, and a good correlation of CE on CT scan and angiography.

Enfisema gástrico como presentación de síndrome de Boerhaave / Boerhaave syndrome presenting as gastric emphysema

No disponible

Tiroidectomía sin incisión cervical por abordaje endoscópico biaxilo-biareolar. Primeras impresiones tras su introducción en una unidad especializada. Revisión de la literatura / Scarless neck thyroidectomy using bilateral axillo-breast approach: Initial impressions after introduction in a specialized unit and a review of the literature

Introducción: El abordaje extracervical para tiroidectomía es poco conocido en nuestro país. Su principal fin es evitar la cicatriz cervical, manteniendo el perfil de seguridad de la tiroidectomía convencional. El objetivo es comunicar nuestra experiencia tras los primeros 15 casos empleando el abordaje endoscópico biaxilo-biareolar (BA-BA) así como revisar los puntos críticos descritos en la literatura. Métodos: Entre junio de 2017 y junio de 2018 se realizaron 15 tiroidectomías endoscópicas empleando abordaje extracervical BA-BA, ubicando incisiones en pliegues axilares y bordes areolares. Las indicaciones fueron bocio benigno y nódulo sospechoso (Bethesda 3/4). Resultados: Los 15 casos (12 pacientes) se abordaron completamente por BA-BA. Se realizaron 5 tiroidectomías totales, 7 hemitiroidectomías y 3 totalizaciones. El tiempo quirúrgico medio para tiroidectomía total fue de 285min y para hemitiroidectomía, de 210 min. El tiempo medio de ingreso fue de 1,67 días. Con un seguimiento medio de 7,73 meses, la tasas de hipoparatiroidismo transitorio y definitivo fueron del 37% y del 0% y se produjo parálisis recurrencial transitoria en un caso. Tasa de disestesias centrotorácicas del 80%, leves y resueltas en el primer mes. El grado de satisfacción cosmética es muy elevado. Conclusión: Nuestra experiencia empleando el abordaje BA-BA es corta pero satisfactoria. Es un procedimiento reproducible que requiere experiencia en cirugía endocrina y endoscópica. Los abordajes extracervicales son una alternativa para pacientes seleccionados con especial preocupación por la cicatriz cervical y no pretenden desplazar a la tiroidectomía convencional, el gold estandard actual. Nuestra sociedad científica debe explorar estos abordajes para sentar indicaciones y limitaciones coherentes

Introduction: The extracervical approach for thyroidectomy remains widely unknown in our country. Its main aim is to avoid a cervical scar while maintaining the same safety profile of conventional thyroidectomy. The objective is to communicate our experience after the first 15 cases using the endoscopic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) and to review critical points described in literature. Methods: Between June 2017 and June 2018, 15 endoscopic thyroidectomies were performed using the BABA extracervical approach, locating incisions in axillary folds and areolar borders. Indications were benign goiter and suspicious nodule (Bethesda 3 and 4). Results: All 15 cases (12 patients) were treated using the extracervical endoscopic technique. We performed 5 total thyroidectomies, 7 hemithyroidectomies and 3 completion thyroidectomies. Mean surgical time for total thyroidectomy was 285 minutes and 210 minutes for hemithyroidectomy. The average hospital stay was 1.67 days. With a mean follow-up of 7.73 months, rates of transient and definitive hypoparathyroidism were 37% and 0%, and transient recurrent nerve palsy occurred in one case. Anterior chest paraesthesia rate was 80%, which were mild and resolved within the first month. The degree of cosmetic satisfaction is very high. Conclusion: Our experience with endoscopic bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy is short but satisfactory. It is a reproducible procedure that requires extensive experience in endocrine and endoscopic surgery. Extracervical approaches are an alternative for selected patients who are especially concerned about cervical scarring and are not intended to displace conventional thyroidectomy, which is the current gold standard. Our Scientific Society should explore these approaches to establish coherent indications and limitations

Scarless neck thyroidectomy using bilateral axillo-breast approach: Initial impressions after introduction in a specialized unit and a review of the literature. / Tiroidectomía sin incisión cervical por abordaje endoscópico biaxilo-biareolar. Primeras impresiones tras su introducción en una unidad especializada. Revisión de la literatura.

INTRODUCTION: The extracervical approach for thyroidectomy remains widely unknown in our country. Its main aim is to avoid a cervical scar while maintaining the same safety profile of conventional thyroidectomy. The objective is to communicate our experience after the first 15 cases using the endoscopic bilateral axillo-breast approach (BABA) and to review critical points described in literature. METHODS: Between June 2017 and June 2018, 15 endoscopic thyroidectomies were performed using the BABA extracervical approach, locating incisions in axillary folds and areolar borders. Indications were benign goiter and suspicious nodule (Bethesda 3 and 4). RESULTS: All 15 cases (12 patients) were treated using the extracervical endoscopic technique. We performed 5 total thyroidectomies, 7 hemithyroidectomies and 3 completion thyroidectomies. Mean surgical time for total thyroidectomy was 285minutes and 210minutes for hemithyroidectomy. The average hospital stay was 1.67days. With a mean follow-up of 7.73months, rates of transient and definitive hypoparathyroidism were 37% and 0%, and transient recurrent nerve palsy occurred in one case. Anterior chest paraesthesia rate was 80%, which were mild and resolved within the first month. The degree of cosmetic satisfaction is very high. CONCLUSION: Our experience with endoscopic bilateral axillo-breast approach thyroidectomy is short but satisfactory. It is a reproducible procedure that requires extensive experience in endocrine and endoscopic surgery. Extracervical approaches are an alternative for selected patients who are especially concerned about cervical scarring and are not intended to displace conventional thyroidectomy, which is the current gold standard. Our Scientific Society should explore these approaches to establish coherent indications and limitations.